By: Bantu Hotsan Simanullang | If people no longer trust the government, to whom else should people believe?

Can we imagine if in a family where the father as head of household is no longer trusted his children or his wife and all of them bring their way. How much destruction the heart of a father, when a child or wife no longer honor its policies as the skipper of the household. If so hope to make good housekeeping will be more distant. Although the father's decision may not always 100 percent correct, but the father would have take into account all the potential that exists Even if no fault can still be covered and corrected, for the sake of something better.

So is the government's plan to increase fuel prices and remove fuel subsidy is then followed by compensation, BLT, which should be carried out earlier this month, 1 April deadlock. The deadlock occurs because the government must deal with layered fortress of the various elements of the community, students, workers and the
See List of ActivistsActivist in various areas with demonstrations express disapproval. Seeing this, the coalition government led by the Democratic Party in the contents Party
Golkar Party Chairman of the Board of TrusteesGolkar, PAN,
DPP Chairman PPP (1989-1994)PPP, PKB,
MPR-RI Chairman 2004-2009MCC, Also collapsed immediately, topsy-turvy express refusal, although it is still shrouded in doubt. Just to dampen the surge of anger that acts instantaneously student anarchists, destroying, scuffled with security forces. Also not to be outdone, some regional heads also said it opposed the central government's policy to increase fuel prices.

Sebegitunyakah loss of public confidence in the government? Will there still be the antidote that can cure people karaguan to the government. Why did it happen? Clearly, there is no leader who could hold his promise, no more exemplary national leadership that can be transmitted. The leaders have lost prestige in the face of society because too often the promise.

Is the topsy-kacirnya the coalition and the refusal of some local governments are regarded as a political pragmatist, with two legs, let alone not be long before the 2014 election was imminent. To show they empathize with what the community felt. Or just steal people's attention, that they did not intend to approve the bandwagon and rising prices hurt people? Only they know.

Behind it all, politics is always winged, any good deed done certain parties are always viewed as imaging, and vice versa, everything is gray, there is no sure thing. Doing the right thing, is considered the imaging, but if a mistake is required to make a change, when carried back again to the improvement of imaging, all awry. No exception to such a view is also directed to the government no longer considered to have a sense of empathy for the people. If the price of fuel is increased and then give BLT, assessed only to save the face of the ruling party, the Democratic Party who was ridden a lot of problems.

See a rejection of government policy, public confidence in government has been lost. May even be on the verge of the limit, no longer do government right now. Whatever is done seen no more sincerity, regarded only as a sweetener on the outside only. But can, understandably, has been the loss of public confidence in the government, can not dipungkuri as the impact of government promises to memuntaskan serious problems such as corruption cases like parasites biting into state property. Make people more frustrated, which had not yet finished but instead raged. This is considered more important than strangling the people resolved to lift fuel subsidies. Due regard, allocation of funds to be diverted subsudi, the tip-ends only for fertile land to feed the corruptors. Menggerahkan indeed!

Regain the public trust in government is something that is absolutely necessary. Back to being a public servant and protector. So also for the community, must be thought together, is not a developed country that is led by people who want or have enough with the situation we now?

Sebegitunyakah loss of public confidence in the government? Will there still be the antidote that can cure people karaguan to the government. Why did it happen? Clearly, there is no leader who could hold his promise, no more exemplary national leadership that can be transmitted. The leaders have lost prestige in the face of society because too often the promise. Community lost a leader figure who could be followed, all of them are just looking for self-interest and group respectively. Fortunately there is a figure Jokowi (Solo Mayor) in the community lose hope (the crisis of leadership) sowed the seeds of future national leadership example. Hopefully!

However, if ever oppose government policy it is always good. Errors are also not fully delegated to the government, because there are critical decisions to be made in certain situations. Unless government policies distorted. Rejection is a statement of changes backwards to be expected. Because of the changes that we also do not know because they have not practiced. If one is something that can be corrected. For that there are times when government and society must both establish a strong fortress to bear in solving problems of this country. Mutually supportive, equally bear the burden of the state. Proverb says, rafting, raft to swim upstream to the edge. No pain to have fun later. Since none of the democracies in the world who would like pinching his people to suffer.

If so, when people no longer believe in the government, to whom else should people believe? Regain the public trust in government is something that is absolutely necessary. Back to being a public servant and protector. As part of the public authorities of this country, must be thought together, is not a developed country that is led by people who want or have enough with the situation we now? Jakarta, 1 April 2012